FORGOT YOUR DETAILS?

 REGULATIONS FOR THE CIAC QUALITY ASSURANCE CERTIFICATION 

These laws are established to confirm the integrity of the Confederation of International accreditation Commission- CIAC and everyone the services provided. These laws are meant to be effective and their interpretation is predicated on the belief of moral values, integrity and a non-profit spirit from every of the members of the Confederation of International accreditation Commission- CIAC.

These premises could evolve to deal with new things or services upon proposal from the members of the Confederation of International accreditation Commission- CIAC. Proposals are going to be accepted by the President from people or teams, together with students, staff, faculty, members of the overall public, governmental agencies, and different establishments or organizations. The President reviews any proposal and acknowledges its responsibility to supply an inexpensive and impartial review. Proposals ought to be sent to the CIAC Secretary.

 Regulations for the quality assurance of educational establishments.

 

2.1. Eligibility for quality assurance certification. 

These premises could evolve to deal with new things or services upon proposal from the members of the Confederation of International accreditation Commission- CIAC. Proposals are going to be accepted by the President from people or teams, together with students, staff, faculty, members of the overall public, governmental agencies, and different establishments or organizations. The President reviews any proposal and acknowledges its responsibility to supply an inexpensive and impartial review. Proposals ought to be sent to the CIAC Secretary.

2.2. Application for quality assurance certification. 

The Confederation of International Accreditation Commission- CIAC has created an application mechanism for QA Certification that will guide the applicant organisations in preparing the Self-Assessment Report and the required documentary proof. The CIAC will not start any assessment process until the corresponding application is filled. The self-assessment report and supporting documents should be presented in English languages subject to acceptance of the CIAC Secretary. When applying for QA certification, an educational establishment should comply with all the CIAC standards, and provide documented proof supporting each standard has been met. Where a standard is not applicable, a statement of why it is not applicable should be included by the applicant. If a standard has not been met, a clear statement of the reasons should be given, and of how the provider intends to justify this situation. Denial or unjustified delay to provide proper evidence or explanatory reports will stop the assessment process. The CIAC guarantees the confidentiality of any documents and data submitted by the institution, as well as any information pertaining to the accreditation process.

 

2.3. Accreditation choices.

The Commission has established other ways to get the Confederation of International accreditation Commission- CIAC accreditation:

2.3.1. IAU members.

This option is basically restricted to member institutions of the UNESCO International Association of Universities. The applicant must be listed in the IAU Handbook. Members of the IAU may be included in the CIAC members list upon recommendations request of any of their board members to the CIAC Secretary or President.

2.3.2. Confederation of International Accreditation Commission- CIAC Choice members.

The Confederation of International accreditation Commission- CIAC choice could be a set of bodies whose accreditation or membership is taken into account similar or cherish CIAC accreditation. Member establishments from any of the CIAC elect bodies could mechanically qualify for the CIAC accreditation. If the establishment isn’t any longer member, recognized or licensed by the CIAC choice bodies, the establishment are going to be needed to travel through a re-accreditation method.

2.3.3. CIAC Full Accreditation.

Any establishment seeking accreditation by the CIAC should demonstrate through the applying for accreditation and self-assessment report that it meets CIAC’s standards. The accreditation method usually takes from one to 3 months, once the applying for accreditation (self-study report) has been properly submitted to the CIAC Secretary.

2.4. Assessment of the accreditation standing.

The CIAC Secretary can distribute the applying for accreditation and connected documents to an on the market member of the commission for the assessment of however every commonplace is addressed by the applying establishment. The CIAC Secretary can communicate the results of the initial accreditation standing to the opposite members of the Commission. The opposite members of the Commission have twelve days since the announcement to review and amend the conclusions and grades of the initial accreditation report. If deemed necessary, the commissioner could need AN interview with the appointed representative of applying establishment or organize a visit from a member of the commission. The president can review the ultimate accreditation report and endorse the ensuing standing considering the following:

2.4.1. Respect for institutional autonomy.

The Confederation of International accreditation Commission- CIAC respects the academic establishment autonomy, which can have its own strategies or internal systems by that it’s educational and business performance is assessed. These strategies should be clearly explained whenever completely different from CIAC’s standards. The accreditation method can vary significantly from somebody to somebody, relying upon explicit circumstances. Even so, the CIAC has embarked on standards that any sensible quality establishment ought to meet.

2.4.2. Thoughtful steering.

The Confederation of International accreditation Commission- CIAC provides the applying {educational establishment |institution |establishment} with a thoughtful steering to help the institution find its own approaches and solutions and meet the CIAC standards. The Commission makes a transparent distinction between what’s needed for accreditation and what’s suggested for improvement of the academic establishment.

2.4.3. Cost-efficient method.

The Confederation of International accreditation Commission- CIAC has the compromise to stay the accreditation method as economical and cost-efficient as potential by minimizing the utilization of interviews, website visits and reports, and by eliminating, whenever potential, duplication of effort between the CIAC accreditation and other review processes.

2.5. Final accreditation report.

The CIAC Secretary can inform the new applying establishment of the conclusions of the accreditation report. A close final accreditation report is shipped to applicant. Some standards represent best apply, and failure to satisfy them might not essentially debar the applying establishment from accreditation, however can highlight a section needing improvement. The commission can indicate whether or not failure to satisfy a selected commonplace can debar the applicant from accreditation. The analysis of every commonplace is hierarchal per the subsequent scale:

4 (Outstanding – No Immediate Need for improvement) A+

3 (Standard – Could improve) A

2 (Acceptable, however, needs improvement) B+

1 (Insufficient – Not meeting the minimums) B

0 (Failed to accommodates this requirement) C

2.6. Accreditation standing.

The CIAC can communicate the results of the analysis of the accreditation standing solely to applicant. The CIAC Secretary can send the corresponding accreditation if applicable. The ensuing average can verify the accreditation status:

* Full accreditation (Final average Grade A+ to A)

Requires re-accreditation review each 3 years.

* Conditional accreditation (Final average Grade B+ to B)

This is a 1 year long temporary standing. The academic establishment should bear a replacement re-accreditation review inside twelve months of conditional accreditation. If full accreditation isn’t achieved during this review, the accreditation standing are going to be denied.

* Denial of accreditation (Final average Grade C)

The Commission can make a case for the explanations for the denial. The accreditation fee isn’t refundable during this scenario. Any establishment during this case could reapply for accreditation once a 12-month-period.

The Confederation of International accreditation Commission- CIAC accreditation affects solely to the licensed establishment and it’s not transferable to any connected third parties. If an licensed establishment interacts with a non-accredited third party, that interaction could embody a press release of participation of the Confederation of International accreditation  Commission- CIAC licensed establishment, however it mustn’t indicate or counsel that the interaction itself, or the other parties concerned, at licensed.

2.7. Status Disagreement.

The Commission can give notice the academic establishment of the results of the analysis of its application. If the academic establishment didn’t meet any commonplace, the Confederation of International accreditation Commission- CIAC shall determine such commonplace and its issues. The academic establishment could trouble the CIAC’s notice of results. The establishment has thirty days following this notice to deal with any errors within the application for accreditation (self-study report) or misunderstandings within the accreditation method. The establishment could embody any further data that clarifies the issues raised by the Commission. Once this 30-day-period, the CIAC’s notices of results are going to be thought of absolutely accepted by the academic establishment.

2.8. Reaccreditation review.

For any reaccreditation review, the academic establishment should submit a replacement complete application (self-study report) to the CIAC Secretary, in any event, less than 5 years since its last accreditation  or reaccreditation, or one year just in case of conditional accreditation . The academic establishment should report any changes of significance in its in operation circumstances to the Confederation of International accreditation Commission- CIAC. These changes may cause a review of the accreditation method.

2.9. The CIAC improvement.

The certified establishment has the correct to remark any suggestions that cause the development of the Confederation of International accreditation Commission- CIAC standards, laws, functioning and procedures from any purpose of read. Subject to the laws of the Commission, one member of AN Confederation of International accreditation Commission- CIAC certified establishment is also conferred to be a member of the Commission.

2.10. Withdrawal of Accreditation.

 The Confederation of International accreditation Commission- CIAC could withdraw accreditation of an academic establishment for decent cause, together with a determination by CIAC that the academic establishment not meets the wants for accreditation. Establishments ought to conjointly note that accreditation is contingent upon payment of current dues.

TOP